Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Dogtooth



It seems like people are talking a lot about Dogtooth, and the talk is largely along the lines of, "I'm not saying you should see it, and I definitely never need to see it again, but it's a good movie." It's one of these movies that I liked,but I have not been recommending it because I don't really want people to watch it thinking, "So this is the sort of thing Lydia is into." It's kind of like when I found out a colleague had never seen Blue Velvet, and I told him to go watch it immediately, then followed up with a thousand caveats: it's weird, it's upsetting, etc. So when I say that Dogtooth is a good movie, what I mean is that it is a COMPLETELY ACCURATE PORTRAYAL OF WHAT HOMESCHOOLING IS LIKE. It could be a documentary of my childhood: incest, felicide (felinocide? catricide?), misleading vocabulary lessons. All true.

I can't help thinking about similarities between Dogtooth and my favorite new movie I saw this year: Never Let Me Go. Both are about children who are not really children, who are fenced in and deliberately misinformed about themselves and the world outside the fences. They are young people constructing their own reality, out of false and partial information. They are terrified of the outside world, and they are obsessed by ordinary shabby objects and bits of popular culture they don't really understand. Both movies use very unusual circumstances to talk about things that are more or less universal to human experience: power, trust, autonomy, mortality, family.

Of course, there are differences. Never Let Me Go made me feel like a human life is very short, unfairly short. It made me think it's very lucky to be allowed to spend any time at all in this maddening, beautiful, incomplete, imperfect world. Dogtooth made me wish I still believed in a cruel and arbitrary God, so I could stop now. That might be comforting.

The thing I liked and hated about Dogtooth, what made it hard to watch, was not really the way the children were mistreated, or the frank depiction of various unromantic (maybe that's an understatement) sexual encounters, or the moments of sudden violence. The thing that made it hard to watch was the way I as a viewer was deliberately underinformed, like the children. In one scene I found particularly troubling, the father and mother discuss a problem late at night, and the father silently and dramatically mouths his words, while we watch over the mother's shoulder. Throughout the movie, people have conversations while we are looking at odd fragments of their bodies. Watching, I felt claustrophobic and bewildered. I guess that makes it a good movie, because I'm pretty sure that's what it was trying to do. But I'm not saying you should go watch it or anything.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Alien Cubed

In light of our recent fascination with genre, I’m going to do my best to avoid all reference to genre in this post. I was unfortunately born far too late to enter into the Alien franchise at a respectable point. Alien (1979) and Aliens (1986) had been on laserdisc for years by the time I was allowed to watch them, but Alien³ (1992) was in theaters at a time when I could spend my allowance and drag my dad to the theater for my occasional terrible choice in movies (this list includes The Faculty and From Dusk ‘til Dawn).

This period also marks the time when I would spend my allowance on various sets of cards purchased at the Trader’s World flea market. Because I identified this as an “adult” film, and part of my entrance into adulthood, I bought the entire set of Alien³ movie cards to only ensure that everyone would be aware of my maturation.

For a long period of time the third film in the franchise occupied the much-coveted third spot in the hier

archy of alien films. I don’t think many would argue that the Ridley Scot

t Alien isn’t the best film in the franchise, with Cameron’s taking second place. It seems the central argument to the Alien movies is where do three and four end up after one and two. After years of carrying this film close to my heart, it’s time to let the chest-burster go and move this film down a peg.

Part of this film suffers from wanting to be a Terry Gilliam movie, but a weirdly sentimental and serious Terry Gilliam movie. Most of the characters are British, and the set design is less futuristic and more industrial in a Brazil sort of way. Just look at Jonathan Pryce on the set of Alie...I mean Brazil.


The film also failed to develop any really sense of character, or at least if it did I failed to realize which relatively unknown, bald, British actor was which relatively underdeveloped psychopath. Poor Pete Postlethwaite. At one point I was certain they had just killed the same guy 17 times. And I only recently found out that William Gibson was the original choice for screenplay writer. I’ll allow him to add his two cents: “It became the first of some thirty drafts, by a great many screenwriters, and none of mine was used (except for the idea, perhaps, of a bar-code tattoo).”

Ultimately, what this film did not do that makes Alien great and Aliens meh is point out that it’s the metaphor that’s scary. We should be afraid of a world where people are treated as itemized inventory, and we should be afraid of the dark. In Alien³ it seems we should be afraid of the alien itself, but in its new dog form.

By the way, I think you could identify which films are the best according to taglines.

Alien: Resurrection: It's been more than 200 years ... The beginning has just started.

Alien: In space no one can hear you scream

Alien³: In 1979, we discovered in space no one can hear you scream. In 1992, we will discover, on Earth, EVERYONE can hear you scream. (The film did not take place on Earth, in case you were wondering)

Aliens: This time there's more

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Some thoughts on the titles of the Alien movies



So, the first three Alien movies in order are:

Alien
Aliens
Alien³

I have always loved the progression of the first to the second, and hated the hokey superscript of the third. Even the Wikipedia article seems to do away with it entirely and simply call the movie Alien 3. I wish to retract my annoyance, at least a little bit. Here's why:

if Alien = singular = 1 and
Aliens = plural = >1
then
Alien³ = (singular)³ = 1³ = 1

So, it works. In the first movie they fight one alien, in the second they fight more than one, and in the third they fight only one, but with the ominous suspicion that exponentiation might be a problem (Ripley's concern that she is hosting a potential queen). I still think it looks silly, in a Cube 2: Hypercube kind of way, but it works for me now. It's too bad every other aspect of the movie doesn't.

Side note: thinking about the movie titles in this way also makes AVP more palatable as it can be read as simple logic notation: A v P. You may end up with just one, both might survive, but we can guarantee you won't leave with neither.

Advanced Dungeons and Dragons

I'm wondering if the Advanced Dungeons and Dragons episode of Community counts as genre parody. Is it fantasy parody? Or is D&D parody almost its own genre? I've been thinking about this since Thad shared the Dragonstrike D&D tutorial they posted on io9.



But really, this question has been lurking in the back of my mind since we discovered the heresy that is AFI's top ten fantasy films. What really constitutes fantasy as a genre? Does fantasy mean something loose and undefined? Am I the only one who thinks that fantasy must have the essential elements of a D&D campaign?

This list is just as inscrutable as AFI's list. Ghostbusters and Superman? Is it just me or are these something else entirely? Is this another case of me overspecifying genres for the sake of especially satisfying classification? You should see my mp3 and e-reader libraries. I have a separate category for unnecessarily sad contemporary British pop.

D&D has a surprisingly developed television history. It ran as a cartoon in the early 1980s, and its role in the finale of Freaks and Geeks was then (and continues to be I think) really popular.
I think the Freaks and Geeks episode, in fact, has a lot in common with D&D on Community. The premise evolves around getting an otherwise cool person to play, and even love, a campaign. In F/G there's one popular guy--James Franco. In Community it seems like there are two regular players and everyone else is the odd man out. Both episodes actually play a bit of the campaign, I'd go so far as to say Community gives you a whole campaign, albeit abbreviated. I want to say it's a bold move, but I guess when the entire premise of your show is that it follows a band of lovable outcasts, well, I guess you're already playing for the D&D crowd.



Freaks and Geeks used D&D to give the series a sense of closure, and it worked. It was a believable way to tell viewers that people who are really different in life can adopt commonalities through fantasy. Community seems to be writing fantasy into its structure more explicitly. As Michael pointed out, genre parody is its best running gimmick, and as io9 blogged, the genres Community most often uses are Sci fi and fantasy. In a way, I wonder if watching Community satirize fantasy can give me some clues as to its genre. Parody is actually a great way to identify the traits of a genre. Terry Pratchett has taught me easily as much as George R.R. Martin. So, I might start posting a bit more about fantasy, and what constitutes fantasy as a genre. I'm still working up to that X Files post, don't worry.*

* You didn't.

Friday, February 11, 2011

Community, tee shirts, cardigans

Tor.com ran a blog post a while ago called Community is the Best Science Fiction/Fantasy Show You're Not Watching. That, along with a deep longing for a Dungeons and Dragons campaign in our new home, led us to watch the D&D episode, which led us to watch every other episode in quick succession. I'm sick today, so I'm watching a LOT of Community.

I really like community. It has some pretty great moments. It's like 30 Rock, and while its highs are not as high as in 30 Rock, the lows are also not as low and it's a little more consistent. And while I'd like to write a full review of the show, I'm not able to as I need to write a mini fashion review of the show. Here's what I'm now obsessed with:

Abed's clothes. Abed is the real SciFi/Fantasy fan, and so I love him just for that, but I also feel a deep and abiding love for his clothes. Abed's fashion concept revolves entirely around two things: tee shirts and cardigans. It's not unusual to own a huge tee shirt collection, but most people (myself included) own only one or two cardigans. Abed appears to own hundreds. Good for him.

I haven't seen such a committed costuming decision since Willow and her sweaters (which makes me want to go back to our age old statement that we'd make all of them for a Christmas tree).

Anyway, here are some tee shirt cardigan combinations I really like:
Stripes. Nice. Lots of these cardigans are stripes, which is pretty great. Wide stripes like the ones on the left are hard to pull off, but since the colors are so close together, and since the gray stripes match the dark gray in his tee shirt, I think it's ok. The varied width of the stripes on the right is my favorite.


Here on the left and center the stripes are on the tee shirt, which is also great, especially because they're different colors. I love the rainbow stripes of the image I uploaded at the top of the page. On the left I love the eggplant and grays. The soft grays and purples would be winners under any circumstances, but the yellow there at the top of the shirt makes it. In the middle the blue totally changes the shirt. Color is also what I like about the combination on the right. Eggplant again, this time on the tee shirt, paired with really bold colors: blues, yellows, reds. I would never wear this. I suspect if I saw someone in this I'd question their decision. Here, I love it. Also, why does he always sit with his hands folded like that? I might start doing that.

The above combinations are mostly blocks of color, except for the RVCA tee shirt on the top right. I love big swatches of color. The below tee shirt is pretty great because it says "Nashville," and I like Nashville. It's a pretty nice city.

So, to summarize: I have a cold, I took some screen shots and then did some research about "T-shirt" versus "tee shirt" in the OED and then searched the internet for pictures of Abed from community in some of his best tee shirt and cardigan combinations, because I think the tv-nerd dungeon master from a show about social rejects is the epitome of fashion.
I am the saddest person you know.

Friday, February 4, 2011

Young Lincoln


Party Down: Young Lincoln
Uploaded by kdlmd243. - See more comedy videos.

1. It is impossible to satirize the crap hollywood produces, because no matter how terrible and ridiculous your idea is, someone will make that movie, or has made that movie, or is making that movie:

http://www.imdb.com/news/ni7354948/

2. Who wants to see Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter on opening night with me!? Yes!