Sunday, July 31, 2011

I would actually sort of like to see our NTC participants post about their own pivotal movies or movie decades.


I tried recently to come up with a big list of "the movies that made me love movies" or something like that. I was thinking of making a movie-themed redwork quilt. (I'm probably not ever going to do that.)

The first movie I saw in a theater was Annie. My grandmother took me to see it, and I was pretty scandalized by all Carol Burnett's bad behavior. Confession: I still think of Tim Curry as Rooster before Frank-N-Furter,  or Wadsworth or whatever else you think of him as. This guy probably:



Labyrinth. The first movie I bought myself on video. Followed closely by And Now For Something Completely Different. It is a very reassuring feeling, owning a movie, knowing that you can see it whenever you want to, and pause it, or start over when it's done. It seems so obvious now, but it was a revelation in 1990 or so.

It's a Wonderful Life and Harvey. I had a record of Jimmy Stewart reading Winnie the Pooh stories when I was a kid. He was the first movie star I felt a personal attachment to. Celebrity culture is one of the weirdest aspects of being a movie lover/watcher/fan. You come to feel as if you know these people, and it's rare (and sort of a relief) to see the occasional movie without familiar faces in it. On the other hand, sometimes you like a movie just because of who is in it...

Dead Poets Society. The first time I remember loving and hating a movie at the same time, which is a really important part of my experience of movies. I fought with people about what was left out (e.g. any women, any poet born after 1900), but I also toted around my mother's copy of The Viking Book of Poetry of the English Speaking World all that summer while I worked at my first job, selling dried flowers to tourists in an alley in Kennebunkport. Parts of Leaves of Grass still remind me of the aggressive scent of lemon verbena and rose potpourri.


Heathers. The first movie that I watched so many times I could recite most of it from memory. It is hard to watch now, because..well, because it's kind of bad. I don't remember why it was so great then. Speaking of things I no longer understand my adolescent fondness for (I'm talking about Winona Ryder), I saw Edward Scissorhands at The Movies on Exchange in Portland, and I was sad for days afterwards, thinking about...you know, mortality and stuff.

The Fisher King. Oh how I loved The Fisher King. I saw other Terry Gilliam movies earlier, and others are better, but The Fisher King is the one that got inside my head, made me incredibly sad, and made me keep thinking about it. I was fifteen when that movie came out. Amanda Plummer's mean, novel-reading character was named Lydia. That alone would probably have won me over.

There were a whole series of sort of smarty-pants movies that I rented and watched by myself, in the back room of the dance studio where my mother was working, or in my room on a tiny black and white TV. These are movies that made me think, made me feel smart and stupid in turn. The Seventh Seal, Mindwalk, Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead, Jesus of Montreal. I am not sure I understood all of the issues raised in these movies. They made me realize that watching a movie can be hard work, and that it can be worth it.

Finally, I remember going to the Nickelodeon theater in Portland, where they showed second run movies for $2. It was a hot day, and I watched Scent of a Woman then immediately went back and watched Benny & Joon. That was the first time I went to see a movie alone, and I loved it so much I did it twice in the same day.

The funny thing about my list of movies that mattered to me is how many of them are not movies I ever need to see again. Even Harvey, which I would have named as my favorite movie for many years, seems a little trite these days, if I'm honest. Does everyone feel this way? The stuff that made you who you are, do you still love that stuff? Are you embarrassed by it? Do you cling defensively--or proudly--to nostalgia for terrible things you loved when you were thirteen?



Friday, July 29, 2011

Sherlock

So...um, yes. Like all of you, I watched series I of Sherlock with total glee, and have been fantasizing about the second series since. Like so many of the BBC Masterpiece anthologies, it was too short for something so delightful, and I find myself wishing it would wear out its welcome with about 20 more episodes this season. Alas.

So, as you can imagine, when I saw that Tor was doing a quick review of various imaginings of Holmes (emphasis on quick--I wouldn't mind something a little more pedantically comprehensive) I followed the jump to read the whole article. I read through without much surprise until I came to this:

"Benedict Cumberbatch"

I am trying to keep my squeals to a mature minimum, but is this, for truth, his name? PLEASE tell me my thus far favorite Holmes adaptation stars Dickensian gentry?

Thad has been insisting we name our first dog "Beric Dondarrion the Lightning Lord," but I'm going to have to vote "Benedict Cumberbatch" for any animal fond of radishes, or exhibiting signs of gout.

Higgledy piggledy,
Benedict Cumberbatch
breaks the Shakespearean
rule with his name.

In TV history
certainly others have
played Sherlock Holmes, but it
isn't the same.




[Photo: Benedict Cumberbatch demands more Higgledy Piggledies!]

Friday, July 15, 2011

Horror isn't just...

Horror isn't just for perverts and lowbrows anymore. Whether the undead pose a threat to serious art is unclear. What I'm more concerned about is the danger serious art poses to the undead.

Jason Zinoman in Slate

Metablogging: The new impulse of NTC

Diabolique is the "Critic's Pick" today over at the New York Times film reviews. The review itself is short and consists mostly of plot summary, but I thought it still warranted mention here as an old favorite. For the truly committed some of the comments are more substantial than the review itself.

Also, The Casual Optimist has an interview with David Kehr, author of When Movies Mattered. I feel weirdly about the title, and about the premise, that there is something special about movies made from 1974-1986.* The numbers seem so arbitrary to me, like when people claim music really happened in 1969. I suppose Kehr's project is much more autobiographical then actually historic, and I would actually sort of like to see our NTC participants post about their own pivotal movies or movie decades. I have no idea what would be mine, except that it would probably be movie posters and VHS covers rather than the movies themselves.

*I also feel weird about Kehr's claim that he "stumbled into film journalism because [he] didn't want to go to grad school." WAS THAT AN OPTION FOR ME?

TEAM CARDIGAN FTW


Honestly, this picture, from this i09 article, made me want to see the movie (and the last one, which I haven't gotten around to either) more than anything else has. I'll have to dig out my "Team Neville" Tshirt...


Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Whoooooaaaa..

I love the new look of NTC. I was thinking of making a banner, but this site is now way too classy for banners.

I will be reviewing only equally lovely films: French new wave, Hitchcock, Tarkovsky. It's a new day.

P.S. I bought more Rex Stout novels today. Summer Victory!