Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Twilight - Kristin's Review

Though it pains me to write this, the time has come (why was I not prepared?) for Angel to step down. I never thought I would say this, but yes, Joss Whedeon's "billowly coated king of pain" has absolutely been out-brooded. Where Angel peers mournfully from beneath his inhuman brow, Edward forces a vicious seethe from an impossible brow *and* chin. Where Angel's dialogue breaks off dramatically to highlight his unspeakable sadness, Twilight's characters stammer and choke, forcing themselves through dialogue so broken and unthinkable no one can bear to complete a sentence. It's like Mamet, but with one-way angst in place of meandering pretension. The critic who called Edward's character "overly Byronic" is to be recognized for what must be the understatement of the century. Never before have I seen a monster stand in the sun and demand that his love look upon his loathsomeness only to twinkle and glisten so fabulously in the light. Traditionally, vampire narratives explore a beast with two natures--a thin veneer of irresistible beauty that barely stretches to conceal the unhinged monster beneath. The audience is almost always treated to a moment in which the film or novel indulgently pulls back the curtain, showing the viewer what fine clothing and exotic pretense are cultivated to conceal. Not so with Twilight. Each step we take into the Cullen's world reveals them to be more lovely than we previously thought. Their life is the ultimate civilization of the beast, and thus at every stage a more noble enterprise. By contrast Jacob, the only character who exhibits any actual kindness or thoughtfulness, appears increasingly animalistic the more he steps up to be Edward's only rival. In the end, I predict a battle between dick hipster city kids (their clothes so colorless, their hair so finely gelled) and the earthy hyper-spiritualized Native Americans (in every scene accessorized with dreamcatchers and airbrushed wolf imagery). The film will insist the battle is epic, and no doubt Edward will yet again (perhaps many times) stand over Bella's beaten body and rage about how her injuries hurt him more, that he'd have spared her exposure to this world out of love, but well, you know how he gets when he smells her. Bella will cling to Edward with an attachment that is more accurately desperation, and theirs will be a love for the ages, torn directly from the pages of a handbook on how to identify an abusive partner. Ultimately, Twilight is very much like the Cullen family--I know it will be my undoing, but I enjoy it. I know it's monstrous to look upon, but I cannot tear myself away. For the rest of these movies I'll be sitting near the front, demanding more angst, more melodrama, possibly a mix tape. [Photo: Excuse me, I believe you dropped your thinly-veiled metaphor.]

Note: a *lot* of the experience of watching this movie is an excruciating exercise in trying to figure out where you've seen all these actors before. If you want to save yourself the pain, imdb it beforehand. A large number of them have never been in anything I've heard of, so I suspect they're simply bred to look familiar. B list celebrity spotting is fun though, and there are some pleasant surprises (NINA MYERS, WILL YOU NOT DIE?!).

4 comments:

Tim said...

Angel is so horrible because he inhabits a fictional setting that is young, sarcastic and likable. He stands out like a big chunk of badness and is the worst. Twilight is its own setting characterized by all the things that make Angel bad. It's vampire cannot be called the billowy-coated king of pain because that would suggest someone in its rhetorical world who would be critical of that.

Kirsten said...

I will pit Angel and Edward against one another regularly. We will settle the question with a battle of jpgs!

Lydia said...

I don't think Angel's hideousness comes from his broody darkness, but from the choices he makes (when he's not evil). Like he said himself, in that stupid episode with the stupid snow: it's not the monster in him that deserves to die, it's the man. Remember how he got a soul and his years of bad behavior made him so depressed that he was in the bell jar until he saw the one thing that could perk him up - a fourteen year old cheerleader eating a lollipop? Gross. Remember how when it came down to it, he went ahead and drank Buffy to survive? He's just so sleazy and evil (when he's not evil). Edward on the other hand, makes more sense completely outside the context of vampires. He's just a drama/emo kid, who happens to have been in a drama/emo phase for a lot of years.

Kirsten said...

Lydia has perfectly encapsulated Angel's character here. I have nothing more to say on the subject ever.